Toyota Rav4 5th Gen Hybrid vs Non-Hybrid Review

Introduction

Toyota RAV4 5th Gen:

Hybrid vs. Non-Hybrid –  Comprehensive Review

One of the most popular compact SUVs, the Toyota RAV4 offers versatility and reliability in its fifth generation. Both hybrid and non-hybrid powertrains are available, allowing buyers to choose between fuel economy and traditional performance. Here is a detailed comparison of the two variants:

Performance

Hybrid:

The fifth-generation RAV4 Hybrid pairs a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine with an electric motor to produce a total of 219 horsepower. This configuration allows for a smooth and quiet ride, especially in city driving where the electric motor can operate independently. Acceleration is quick, with a 0-60 mph time of approximately 7.8 seconds,  quicker than the non-hybrid version.

Non-Hybrid:

The non-hybrid model uses a 203-horsepower, 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine. It has slightly less power than the hybrid but offers a more traditional driving experience. Acceleration is good at about 8.0 seconds to 60 mph, but engine noise can cause a loss of refinement during hard acceleration.

Winner:

Hybrid (quick acceleration, smooth handling).

Fuel Economy

Hybrid:

The Hybrid model boasts an EPA rating of 41 MPG city and 38 MPG highway, making it a great choice for fuel-conscious drivers and those who frequently commute in city areas.

Non-Hybrid:

The non-hybrid RAV4 gets 27 mpg city and 35 mpg highway, which are respectable for the class but not quite up to the Hybrid.

Winner:

Hybrid (Excellent Fuel Economy).

Driving Experience

Hybrid:

The Hybrid model benefits from a more advanced all-wheel-drive (AWD) system in which an electric motor drives the rear wheels. This configuration provides better traction and a smoother ride, even on slippery surfaces.

Non-Hybrid:

The  non-hybrid offers a simpler mechanical AWD system as an option. It’s reliable, but not as sophisticated as the hybrid’s e-AWD system.

Winner:

Hybrid (improved all-wheel drive and a smoother ride).

Maintenance and Operating Costs

Hybrid:

The hybrid saves on fuel costs, but the battery and electrical components may mean higher  maintenance costs in the long run. However, the proven reliability of Toyota’s hybrids alleviates that major concern.

Non-Hybrid:

The non-hybrid model has a simpler mechanical design, which may mean lower maintenance costs in the long run.

Winner:

Non-Hybrid (low maintenance).

Environmental Impact

Hybrid:

With lower emissions, the hybrid is the greener choice and appeals to environmentally conscious buyers.

Non-Hybrid:

Non-Hybrids are more efficient but produce more CO2 and are less sustainable in the long run.

Winner:

Hybrid (lower carbon dioxide emissions).

Cargo Space and Interior

With the Hybrid’s battery cleverly located under the rear seats, both models offer the same cargo space: 37.6 cubic feet  behind the rear seats and 69.8 cubic feet with the seats folded. Interior dimensions and equipment are also identical, providing both models with a practical and comfortable cabin.

Winner:

Tie (equal space and ease of use).